Skip to main content

Current studies let you know zero tall relationship between Conscientiousness and you may narcissism (Miller mais aussi al

By 2022년 08월 30일No Comments

Current studies let you know zero tall relationship between Conscientiousness and you may narcissism (Miller mais aussi al


There have been 437 (270 lady) professionals, who had been hired through in public places accessible networks. The imply ages is 23 decades (SD = 5.96). Users was in fact questioned to complete a collection of surveys some of which aren’t associated towards newest study. Most of the subjects offered its told agree towards launch of the take to results to own research aim, and all was in fact considering views to the general results of the analysis. The new dataset analysed when you look at the current study is present in the


Vulnerable narcissism is mentioned for the Hypersensitive Narcissism Size from the Hendin and Cheek (1997) regarding the Gloss interpretation (come across Czarna et al. 2014). It consists of ten circumstances having a Likert-particularly reaction measure from 1 (strongly disagree) to help you 5 (highly concur).

Grandiose narcissism are reviewed to your validated Gloss adaptation (Bazinska and you will Drat-Ruszczak 2000) of your Narcissistic Character Catalog (Raskin and you will Hallway 1979). Those things were selected basing towards grounds studies (loadings exceeding .40) and you can portrayed the second subscales of your NPI: Power (11 points), Self-Sufficiency (7), Mirror (5), and you can Exhibitionism (11). Participants ranked their degree of endorsement of any statement using a good Likert-type of impulse style, from one (doesn’t affect myself) to help you 5 (pertains to myself). The sum activities produces a collection off grandiose narcissism. It’s been found recently your Likert structure NPI manifests equivalent construct authenticity and you can slightly enhanced reliability into brand spanking new forced-selection structure (Miller mais aussi al. 2018a).

The top Four try analyzed having Shine version (Strus mais aussi al. 2014) of the Around the world Character Product Pond – Large Four Element Level (BFAS; DeYoung et al. 2007). It is an one hundred-goods measure of characteristic domains (Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Neuroticism, and you can Transparency/Intellect) plus the a couple all the way down-buy aspects of for each website name (Volatility, Withdrawal, Mercy, Complimentary, Industriousness, Orderliness, Desire, Assertiveness, Intelligence, and Transparency). Professionals is questioned in order to rates exactly how much the newest comments was related to them on a Likert-form of level, in one (strongly disagree) so you can 5 (highly consent).


Very first, we examined brand new correlations ranging from two variants out-of narcissism and you may identification characteristics together with domain names and you may issue (Table 1). Each other version of narcissism correlated that have characteristics when you look at the a similar way to previous search (age.grams. Miller ainsi que al. 2011). Particularly, insecure narcissism are certainly synchronised with Neuroticism, and you can negatively of the Agreeableness and you can Extraversion. Grandiose narcissism synchronised definitely with Extraversion, Openness/Intellect and you may Conscientiousness, and negatively which have Neuroticism and you will Agreeableness.

Subsequently, we compared the associations between each type of narcissism and aspects of personality within each domain. Therefore, we tested for the difference between two dependent correlations (Steiger 1980). Figure 1 illustrates graphically the patterns of correlations. We found that vulnerable narcissism was significantly and positively correlated with both aspects of Neuroticism and that correlations did not differ from one another (z =,215, p = 0.820), which supported H1. In addition, consistent with H2, grandiose narcissism was significantly and negatively correlated with Withdrawal, and this correlation was stronger than with Volatility (z = 5.85, p < 0.001). Grandiose narcissism correlated positively with both aspects of Extraversion; however, the association was stronger for Assertiveness (z = , p < 0.001), which supported H3. Vulnerable narcissism was equally negatively related to both Assertiveness and Enthusiasm (z = ?1.90; p = 0.060; H4). The results also supported H5; grandiose narcissism was negatively correlated with both aspects of Agreeableness. However, the correlation with Politeness was significantly stronger (z = 6.26; p < 0.001). The correlation of vulnerable narcissism with both aspects of Agreeableness was negative and the magnitudes of these correlations were similar (z = .261; p = 0.79). Thus, H6 was only partially supported, because we expected a higher association with Compassion. Finally, H7 was also supported: grandiose narcissism correlated positively with Intellect and this association was stronger than with Openness (z = 7.40; p < 0.001).


Author 권소영

More posts by 권소영